Summary Cards

Click the title for more information on a clinical resource. To download a PDF file, click the Download button.

 

Clinical Summary of Hannah Poster Presentation This article is intended to compare case... Show more
Clinical Summary of Hannah Poster Presentation This article is intended to compare case delays in all patients undergoing breast conserving surgery (BCS) with wire localization in 2017 with all patients undergoing BCS with a radiofrequency identification tag system. Read the Hologic clinical summary document for Hannah Poster Presentation Please visit PubMed for the full text article.  
Download
  Clinical Summary of DiNome Breast Cancer Reserach and Treatment 2019 A... Show more
  Clinical Summary of DiNome Breast Cancer Reserach and Treatment 2019 A prospective, single-center pilot study evaluated the effectiveness of the FDA-cleared Radiofrequency Identification Localization System (RFLS). Read the Hologic clinical summary document for DiNome 2019 Please visit PubMed for the full text article.  
Download
Clinical Summary of Dauphine Annals of Surgical Oncology 2010 The article is intended to... Show more
Clinical Summary of Dauphine Annals of Surgical Oncology 2010 The article is intended to assess the feasibility of using RFID technology to localize nonpalpable breast lesions. Read the Hologic clinical summary document for Dauphine 2010 Please visit PubMed for the full text article.  
Download
Clinical Summary of Dauphine 2015 The article is intended to assess the safety and... Show more
Clinical Summary of Dauphine 2015 The article is intended to assess the safety and performance of a radiofrequency identification tag to localize nonpalpable breast lesions for surgical excision. Read the Hologic clinical summary document for Dauphine 2015 Please visit PubMed for the full text article.
Download
Clinical Summary of Martin Eur Radiol 2018. This prospective study has two objectives. The... Show more
Clinical Summary of Martin Eur Radiol 2018. This prospective study has two objectives. The first objective is compare single reading of tomosynthesis examinations to double reading of 2D examinations. The second objective is to assess whether 2D FFDM have any added value when using synthesized 2D mammography (s2D) together with digital breast Tomosynthesis. Read the Hologic clinical summary document for Martin Eur Radiol 2018 Please visit PubMed for the full text article.
Download
Clinical Summary of Patel AJR 2017. The article first compares the sensitivity and... Show more
Clinical Summary of Patel AJR 2017. The article first compares the sensitivity and specificity of contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM) to breast MRI. The next portion lays the foundation for CEDM as a diagnostic alternative to breast MRI based on cost, equipment, and patient access to these modalities. Read the Hologic clinical summary document for Patel AJR 2017 Please visit PubMed for the full text article.
Download
Clinical Summary of Rafferty E et al 2017 The objective of this study was to evaluate the... Show more
Clinical Summary of Rafferty E et al 2017 The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect by age of adding tomosynthesis to full field digital mammography for breast cancer screening. Read the Hologic clinical summary for Rafferty E et al 2017. Please visit PubMed for the full text article.
Download
Clinical Summary of Aujero MP et al 2017 The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare... Show more
Clinical Summary of Aujero MP et al 2017 The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the clinical performance of synthesized 2D (s2D) and DBT, FFDM and DBT to and FFDM alone, in a large community based screening population. The group analyzed outcomes performance, including recall rates, positive predictive values, cancer detection rate among others. Read the Hologic clinical summary for Aujero MP et al 2017. Please visit PubMed for the full text article.
Download
Clinical Summary of Ali-Mucheru M et al 2016. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the... Show more
Clinical Summary of Ali-Mucheru M et al 2016. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM) in determining the surgical management of breast cancer. When breast MRI (bMRI) was also performed, CEDM results were compared with bMRI. Read the Hologic clinical summary document for Ali-Mucheru M et al 2016 Please visit PubMed for the full text article.
Download
Clinical Summary of Zuckerman SP et al 2016 The goal of this study was to compare the... Show more
Clinical Summary of Zuckerman SP et al 2016 The goal of this study was to compare the performance of synthesized 2D mammography in a screening population utilizing only digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) with a generated 2D images. A comparison of recall rates and cancer detection rates to prior outcomes of full field digital mammography (FFDM) and DBT. Read the Hologic clinical summary for Zuckerman SP et al 2016. Visit PubMed for the full text article.  
Download
Clinical Summary of McDonald ES et al 2016 This study of breast cancer screening published... Show more
Clinical Summary of McDonald ES et al 2016 This study of breast cancer screening published online by JAMA Oncology suggests digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) outcomes were sustainable with significant reduction in patient recall, increasing cancer cases per recalled patients and a decline in interval cancers. Read the Hologic clinical summary for McDonald ES et al 2016. Please visit PubMed for the full text article.  
Download
Clinical Summary of Fajardo LL et al 2016 The goal of this pilot study was to compare... Show more
Clinical Summary of Fajardo LL et al 2016 The goal of this pilot study was to compare characterization and conspicuity of common breast lesions imaged by two different scan angles, 15° and 30° angles, in patients with BI-RADS 0 assessment on FFDM examinations. Image quality concerning the elimination of superimposed tissue and overall DBT preference was also evaluated. Read the Hologic clinical summary for Fajardo LL et al 2016. Please visit PubMed for the full text article.
Download
Clinical Summary of Rafferty EA et al 2016 Using data from their previous multicenter study,... Show more
Clinical Summary of Rafferty EA et al 2016 Using data from their previous multicenter study, the authors evaluated the differential screening performance of digital mammography combined with tomosynthesis compared with digital mammography alone as a function of breast density. Read the Hologic clinical summary for Rafferty EA et al 2016. Please visit PubMed for the full text article.
Download
Clinical Summary of Durand M et al 2015, presented at the Radiological Society of North America... Show more
Clinical Summary of Durand M et al 2015, presented at the Radiological Society of North America 2015 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting. The goal of this study was to compare synthesized 2D mammography using Hologic’s C-View™ software plus tomosynthesis (C-View+DBT) to traditional 2D digital mammography plus tomosynthesis (DM+DBT) in a clinical setting. Read the Hologic clinical summary of  Durand M et al 2015. View the abstract on the RSNA website.
Download
Clinical Summary of Zuckerman S et al 2015 The goal of this study was to evaluate a population... Show more
Clinical Summary of Zuckerman S et al 2015 The goal of this study was to evaluate a population screened entirely with synthesized 2D digital mammograms using Hologic’s C-View™ software plus tomosynthesis (C-View+DBT). Recall rates and recall finding types from the C-View+DBT population were compared to similar historic outcomes from traditional digital mammography plus tomosynthesis screening (DM+DBT).   Read the Hologic clinical summary for Zuckerman S et al 2015.
Download
Clinical Summary of Skaane P et al 2014 In this study, 24,901 screening examinations were... Show more
Clinical Summary of Skaane P et al 2014 In this study, 24,901 screening examinations were prospectively interpreted independently by 8 radiologists. Two versions (initial version and current new improved version ) of reconstructed 2D images were used in this study Initial version was used on 12,631 women during the periods 1 from November 22, 2010, to December 21, 2011; and the current new improved version was used on 12,270 women during the period 2 from January 20, 2012, to December 19, 2012. They were compared in terms of cancer detection and false-positive rates with the corresponding FFDM plus DBT interpretations. Two standard views (CC and MLO) were included in these modes. Read the Hologic clinical summary document for Skaane P et al 2014 Please visit PubMed for the full text article.
Download
Clinical Summary of Zuley M et al 2014 The objective of this study was to compare the... Show more
Clinical Summary of Zuley M et al 2014 The objective of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance and radiation dose of Hologic’s 2D synthesized mammogram when used alone or in combination with tomosynthesis to standard FFDM when used alone or in combination with tomosynthesis. Read the Hologic clinical summary for Zuley M et al 2014. Please visit PubMed for the full text article.
Download
Clinical Summary of Friedewald SM et al 2014 The objective of this study was to study how 3D... Show more
Clinical Summary of Friedewald SM et al 2014 The objective of this study was to study how 3D mammography (breast tomosynthesis) in combination with 2D mammography when used in breast cancer screening has impacted patient care at 13 academic and community based sites in the U.S. Read the Hologic clinical summary for Friedewald SM et al 2014. Please visit PubMed for the full text article.
Download
Clinical Summary of Beck N et al 2013 presented at ARRS 2013 The objective of this study was... Show more
Clinical Summary of Beck N et al 2013 presented at ARRS 2013 The objective of this study was to evaluate the added benefit in acquiring both tomosynthesis views craniocaudal and mediolateral oblique) rather than a single view in visualizing breast cancer. The study results demonstrated that obtaining both views is necessary to ensure that a cancer will be optimally visualized and derive the greatest potential benefit from tomosynthesis. Read the Hologic clinical summary of Beck N et al 2013
Download
Clinical Summary of Ciatto S et al 2013 The objective of this study was to evaluate the... Show more
Clinical Summary of Ciatto S et al 2013 The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of the addition of tomosynthesis to conventional 2D mammography in population breast-cancer screening. Read the Hologic Clinical Summary of Ciatto S et al 2013 Please visit PubMed for the full text article.
Download
Clinical Summary of Rose SL et al 2013 The objective of this study was to assess the changes... Show more
Clinical Summary of Rose SL et al 2013 The objective of this study was to assess the changes in performance measures after the introduction of tomosynthesis into clinical practice.   Read the Hologic clinical summary for Rose SL et al 2013 Please visit PubMed for the full text article.    
Download
Clinical Summary of Dang et al 2013 The objective of this study was to compare the... Show more
Clinical Summary of Dang et al 2013 The objective of this study was to compare the interpretation times between conventional screening mammography and screening combined tomosynthesis and conventional 2D mammography in a large academic center with multiple participating radiologists with a wide range of experience for determining the effect of implementing a screening tomosynthesis program. Read the Hologic clinical summary for Dang et al 2013. Please visit PubMed for the full text article.
Download
Clinical Summary of Kalra V et al 2012 The objective of this study was to determine the cost... Show more
Clinical Summary of Kalra V et al 2012 The objective of this study was to determine the cost effectiveness of mammographic screening using combined Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) and Full-Field Digital Mammography (FFDM) vs. FFDM alone based on direct costs resulting from differences in the recall rate. Read the Hologic clinical summary for Kalra V et al 2012. For the complete abstract, please visit the RSNA website.
Download